Statistical Diary of the United Nations ECE nineteen (2002) 65–78 IOS Press
Industrial and usage waste. The right way to
meet the signal needs. Experiences from
Statistics Finland, Environment and Energy, PB 6A, FIN-OOO22 Statistics Finland, Finland Tel.: +358 9 1734 3457; Fax: +358 9 1734 2465; E-mail: simo. [email protected] ﬁ Subjective. Statistics Finland has put together waste statistics since the mid-1980s. The data materials included management registers, research and study results. Waste materials was initially classiﬁed according into a ‘Finnish' classiﬁcation based on make up of waste materials until the mid-1990s, and later based on the European Spend Catalogue (EWC). A Guide to Waste Classiﬁcation was drafted to facilitate classiﬁcation in 1999. The Standard Industrial Classiﬁcation (NACE) have been employed being a background classiﬁcation for waste materials statistics. Squander statistics have been and are getting used especially for setting up the countrywide waste strategy and the squander management rules, in the preparing stage of waste treatment plants, to get research, and as supplementary material for system of material ﬂow accounting.
Even though Finnish spend statistics will be fairly inclusive, they have certainly not been able to elucidate all the required features. The largest problem is the fact that development trend of waste materials volumes even now remains uncertain. Regional and international comparability also remains weak. The moment waste statistics are not sufﬁcient to describe transform, they cannot be sufficient indicators of sustainable creation. At the heart of the problems can be that spend has been separated from its interpersonal origins – although environmental load including emissions and waste happen to be results of economic and social activity, their measurement is made ‘scientiﬁcally'. This survey attempts to show with a few examples how social change can inﬂuence waste materials and result in interpretation mistakes with respect to the progress waste volumes. In general, it is far from possible to take care of these mistakes, nor will be attempts made to do so.
– The ﬁrst example may be the volume modify caused by exts or savings in the deﬁnition of waste materials, which usually result from changes in interpersonal views and attitudes. Social atmosphere and conditions will be reﬂected in various sectors of waste administration, and thus also in the amounts of spend generation as well as treatment in statistics, in classiﬁcations and data collection.
– The other example problems the a shortage of certain instruments from ingestion waste figures that are familiar e. g. from intake expenditure research, such as the scale the intake unit. It might be easily shown that the two consumption and volumes of consumption waste grow even though nobody will consume more or develop any more waste. The third issue is the connection of waste materials ﬂows to economic development. The time number of the Total Materials Requirement (TMR) appears to indicate that the amount of waste generated inside a country does not adhere to exactly the same development track because economic advancement.
1 . Waste in Finland: Data and statistics
Stats Finland offers compiled squander statistics for about 17 years. The ﬁrst statistics that contains empirical materials were released in 85. Before this kind of, some random research had been produced, mainly to supplement commission reports. Before 1969 record data relating to waste were very simple in characteristics.
0167-8000/01/$8. 00 2002 – IOS Press. Every rights appropriated
S i9000. Vahvelainen / Industrial and consumption waste
Initially, Statistics Finland's waste statistics had been concerned with professional production just, i. at the. manufacturing, mining and quarrying, and energy supply. Stats were put together on the basis of research made in significant industrial establishments. Nowadays the info of the environmental administration monitoring register (= VAHTI, The Monitoring and Environmental Reloading Data System) are the main data options.
In order to ensure that the...
References: System (proposal), Brussels, 2001.
Euro Environment Agency (EEA), Home and comunitario waste: Assessment of data in EEA member countries,
Matter report No 3/2000, Copenhagen, 2000.
Eurostat, Indicators of Sustainable Expansion, Luxembourg, 97.
Eurostat, To environmental pressure indicators for the EU, Luxembourg, 1999.
Ministry in the Environment – Statistics Finland – Finnish Environment Institute, Guide to Spend Classiﬁcation, Handbooks
37B, Figures Finland, Helsinki, 1999.
J. Muukkonen, TMR, DMI and Material Balances, Finland 1980–1997, Eurostat Operating Papers 2/2000/B/1, 2000.
Stats Finland, Changes in Household Usage Expenditure in the 1990s, Income and Intake 28 (2000),
Figures Finland, Environment Statistics, Environment and Natural Resources a couple of (2001), Helsinki.
S. Vahvelainen and E. Salomaa, Waste products from Development and Consumption, Environment and Natural Resources 5 (2000),
Statistics Finland, Helsinki.
Finland, at the Unit of Environment and Strength as a Elderly Statistician. This individual has worked in the short term at Eurostat (1999–2000).